| ANALYTICAL |
|
| METHODS | |
| IN | |
| ARCHAEOLOGY |
| Anthropology 588 | Geostat Lab: Alderman |
| University of Virginia | Tuesday:5:00-7:30 |
| Spring 2002 | Fraser D.Neiman |
|
| |
|
Description This course examines quantitative analytical techniques used in archaeology. Topics include, regression, smoothing, correlation, measures of diversity and distance, spatial autocorrelation and Mantel methods, seriation, ordination, and clustering. The course features intensive analysis of real archaeological datasets, motivated by real archaeological problems. Highly recommended pre-requisite: an introductory course in statistics. Texts The following texts are required. They are available at the UVA Bookstore:
As you will soon discover, you can never have too many statistics books! To help you get started, here are a few recommendations. We'll be sampling all of them during the course. For a gentle review of basic descriptive and inferential statistics in archaeology, check out Robert D. Drennan's Statistics for Archaeologists: A Commonsense Approach (1996, Plenum, New York). Drennan stresses the Exploratory Data Analysis(EDA)approach developed by John Tukey and his students, starting in the 1970's. Visualizing Data , by William S. Cleveland (1993, Hobart Press, Summit New Jersey) offers beautifully illustrated treatment of both elementary and more advanced EDA methods (e.g. loess). M.J. Baxter's Exploratory Multivariate Analysis in Archaeology (1994, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh) offers first rate coverage of the standard multivariate methods: principal components, correspondence, cluster, and discriminant analyses. Sadly, it is out of print. But it's worth trying to find a copy. There is considerable overlap, not widely recognized, between analytical methods used in ecology and archaeology. Astoundingly complete coverage of the ecological side can be found in Numerical Ecology 2nd Edition, by Pierre and Louis Legendre (1998, Elsevier, Amsterdam). Brian Manly's Randomization, Bootstrap, and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology offers both an accessible introduction to and up-to-date coverage of techniques that figure importantly in archaeology as well (2001, Chapman and Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton). Finally, if you do not already own one, you should acquire a good, comprehensive statistics text. I recommend Sokal, Robert R. Sokal and F. James Rohlf's classic, Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 3rd Edition (1995, W.H. Freeman, San Fransico). |
|
Requirements Written work for the course includes Problems Sets and a Final Project. Problem Sets will be assigned nearly every week. Completed problem sets will be due the following week, at the beginning of class, when we will discuss them. Your write up should include not only your numerical results, illustrated with appropriate graphics, but also a description of how you got them and what you think they mean, both in statistical and archaeological terms. The text should be no more than three pages, doubled spaced. You should also be prepared to offer the class a succinct summary of your work, as a contibution to the class discussion of the problem sets. Late problem sets will not be accepted. The Final Project is your opportunity to use the methods we have covered in the course to tease substantive meaning out of archaeological data. Note that the emphasis here is on meaning: the project should emphasize analytical methods as tools to make and evaluate defensible inferences about past dynamics from material evidence. You will need to identify an historical or anthropological issue and one or more sets of quantitive archaeological data that might be used to illuminate it. You are encouraged to choose issues and data in which you have a personal research interest and, therefore, basic familiarity with the current background literature. The data you use should contain information on several different variables that are of potential relevance to your problem. A key part of the project will be defending their relevance. The data should contain additional variables that independently document either the temporal or spatial contexts of the objects (assemblages, artifacts) characterized by the "relevant" variables. Over the first several weeks of the course, we will work together to identify suitable issues and datasets for everyone. The topic and dataset(s) for your project must be approved by the instructor. Your write up for the final project should not exceed 15 pages (double-spaced), exclusive of graphics. Grades of the course will be computed as follows: PS*.6 + FP*.3 + CD*.1, where PS=mean score for all problem sets, FP=score for the final project, and CD=mean score for contributions to class discussion. |
|
Reading List Click here |
Datasets
|
|
Useful Bits of Code, etc.
|
Software Tools
|